
When we launched our petition calling on the government to make pension transfers quicker and simpler, we set ourselves an ambitious goal - 10,000 signatures. What happened next exceeded even our expectations.
During the six months that the petition was live, more than 16,500 people from across the UK - from Land’s End to John O’Groats - added their names. That collective voice has now triggered a formal government response.
While a petition response may sound procedural, it isn’t. This moment matters.
It represents thousands of savers speaking up about a system that too often fails them at the moment they’re trying to take control of their financial future.
At PensionBee, we see the reality of pension transfers every day. For many savers, bringing pensions together is first and foremost about clarity, confidence and feeling in control. They may also be looking for more suitable investment options which yield better returns, to manage fees, or to be served by superior technology and personalised customer service - all valid reasons. Yet transfers can still take weeks or even months, creating unnecessary stress, uncertainty and disengagement. In a world where we can switch banks or mobile providers in days, the pension transfer disconnect feels increasingly out of step with modern life.
The government’s response acknowledges this frustration. It acknowledges the importance of efficiency in the pension transfers system and accepts that delays can occur under the current framework. Crucially, it also highlights that the practical application of existing regulations - particularly those introduced in 2021 to combat pension scams - may have contributed to some of those delays.
This is an important admission.
Protecting savers from scams is non-negotiable. Pension fraud can be devastating, and robust safeguards must remain at the heart of the system. But protection and efficiency shouldn’t be competing objectives. Savers shouldn’t be forced to trade speed for safety, or vice versa. A well-designed system must be capable of delivering both.
The government has committed to working with the pensions industry to explore operational improvements, including greater use of electronic processes, and has confirmed that the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) plans to consult on potential changes in the coming months. That consultation will be a critical opportunity to get this right.
However, it’s also clear from the response that meaningful, market-wide change may require primary legislation. That makes progress slower - but it also makes public pressure more important than ever. The fact that this petition reached the threshold to trigger a government response sends a powerful signal - savers care deeply about how their pensions work, and they expect the system to evolve with them.
This is about more than just pension transfers. When pensions are difficult to move, they’re easier to ignore. Small pots get left behind, engagement drops, and people lose sight of what they’re saving for. A smoother transfer process supports better retirement outcomes by helping savers see their pensions as something active and accessible, not distant and complicated. It allows them to engage. And engagement leads to better outcomes.
What encouraged me most about our petition’s success was the breadth of support. It wasn’t just industry voices or policy specialists signing. It was everyday savers who want pensions to work in a way that reflects how people live and work today - with multiple jobs, career breaks and changing circumstances over a lifetime.
So while we welcome the government’s response, this can’t be the end of the conversation. Consultation must lead to action, and action must lead to tangible improvements that savers can feel. Faster, safer transfers are not a ‘nice to have’; they’re a fundamental part of a pension system that supports confidence, trust and long-term financial wellbeing.
To everyone who signed, shared or supported the petition - thank you! You’ve helped move this important issue forward. Now we need to make sure that momentum isn’t lost - because the pension system should be built around the needs of the people who rely on them, not the processes that slow them down. We must tear down the barriers that prevent people from taking control of their retirement.
Risk warning
As always with investments, your capital is at risk. The value of your investment can go down as well as up, and you may get back less than you invest. This information should not be regarded as financial advice.
Period | Market Event | FTSE World TR GBP (%) | 4Plus Plan (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
4Plus Plan’s inception – 6 Sept 2013 | QE Tapering, China Interbank Crisis and its aftermath | -5.44 | -2.41 |
3 Oct 2014 – 15 May 2015 | Oil price drop, Eurozone deflation fears & Greek election outcome | -5.87 | -1.77 |
7 Jan 2016 – 14 Mar 2016 | China’s currency policy turmoil, collapse in oil prices and weak US activity | -7.26 | -1.54 |
15 June 2016 – 30 June 2016 | BREXIT referendum | -2.05 | -1.07 |







